On Jun 7, 2015, Bernd Steinhauser <[email protected]> wrote: >On 07/06/15 17:04, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to suggest installing systemd units unconditionally. At the >> moment, the "systemd" option is mostly used to install them. >> >> Sometimes, though, e. g. in PHP, it means something completely >> different. In other cases, it's used to break cyclic dependencies and >> in yet other cases, it's actually used to disable systemd >integration. >> >> It's a mess. >> >> If we just install systemd units unconditionally... >> >> - - we can use the "systemd" option to just mean "systemd >integration" >> (and a handful of cyclic dep breakers), >> >> - - we don't hurt anyone - they're tiny text files, >> >> - - we reduce confusion (e. g. PHP usually should have the systemd >> option *disabled*), >> >> - - we get rid of an option that's purely for runtime configuration, >> >> - - we reduce the options clutter, >> >> >> Plus: The systemd option defaults to on anyway so unless someone >> globally sets "-systemd" (fool!) the units are installed anyway. >> >> >> Please do respond even if it's just +1. Knowing you lazy bastards >;-), >> though, I'll just do this - unless there's violent opposition - in >> about a week from now. >I'm for it, but maybe we could also just make them parts: systemd-unit? >That way people who are nit picky could still opt out. > >_______________________________________________ >Exherbo-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
I am no longer a contributor, so my vote doesn't matter, but I completely agree regarding the parts: compromise. _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
