On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, David Wilson wrote: > The definition for "MESSAGE_ID" is simply "the message's id". I've just spent > a bit of time wondering why a far-off part of my system was seeing Exim's ID > for the message instead of the Message-ID. Of course, I should have considered > which ID was being referred to when I first read the documentation. :) > > Nonetheless, I think it would be a good thing to make it a little bit clearer, > say: "Exim's ID for the message (this not the Message-ID: header)".
Good point. Noted. Thanks. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714. Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
