On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Marc Sherman wrote: > > It might be a good idea to come up with a unique name for the message ID > that exim uses internally. It's always seemed problematic to me that > there are two distinct (but related) concepts both called message id. In > at least one case ISTR someone being told to use $h_message-id: when > they were trying to determine the internal ID of a message. I know that > change would be a big job in the docs, but IMO it would be worth it to > reduce confusion.
I think Sendmail uses the term "queue id". However changing Exim's term is more than just a documentation problem, because of things like $message_id. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
