On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Edgar Lovecraft wrote: > Okay, we could shorten that :P > > $message_transportID ??
How about $message_exim_id? (That's not a huge change from $message_id, which seems like a benefit.) On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Bob Johannessen wrote: > Wasn't there a wish to have the message ID allocated at MAIL FROM: > time? If that's implemented I think transaction_id would be a > descriptive name... Yes, there was. It's on the Wish List. It might even get done sometime. :-) However, I think a lot of people aren't all that clued up as to what a "transaction" is. :-( -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
