------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721 --- Comment #1 from Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-14 20:37:19 --- I believe you should call log_write with LOG_PANIC_DIE if you need to bomb out. i wonder if dynamic.c is as generic as it sounds. I.e. perhaps the load_so/load_sym helpers should be in there and the libspf stubs in a separate file that you cause to be compiled by editing EDITME (no #ifdef DYNAMIC_LOADER). -DDYNAMIC_LOADER isn't specific to libspf as it is now (although it's the only thing managed that way to start with. I wonder if you gain much with that dltable[]. You can't put the stubs in a table anyway, sou you could as well use separate variables. You could define a macro that avoids duplicating all the if (! fn_foo_sym) fn_foo_sym = load_sym(...). I think that assuming that the dlname is libspf2.so.2 is more portable than assuming that the .la file is in /usr/local/lib. You don't want to have to ask Marc to patch your patch, do you? :-) If/when the ABI changes, the API might change as well so that you'll have to adapt the code anyway. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
