------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721




--- Comment #7 from Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-06-23 19:07:53 ---
On Sunday 15 June 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> Does this one look better?  Haven't tested it in runtime yet, but I will
> tomorrow.

I would even go as far as getting rid of dynamic.c altogether and putting 
everything as macros or possibly inline functions (it's experimental after 
all) in dynamic.h. I think we can afford that. And LOAD_FN should be there 
too - it's not specific to SPF. You don't need the libspf_ prefix of 
libspf_dlname and libspf_so_handle.

I would also make the function pointers static variables inside the respective 
stubs.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details 
at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to