------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721 --- Comment #8 from Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-24 12:24:54 --- (In reply to comment #7) > On Sunday 15 June 2008, Robert Millan wrote: > > Does this one look better? Haven't tested it in runtime yet, but I will > > tomorrow. > > I would even go as far as getting rid of dynamic.c altogether and putting > everything as macros or possibly inline functions (it's experimental after > all) in dynamic.h. I think we can afford that. And LOAD_FN should be there > too - it's not specific to SPF. You don't need the libspf_ prefix of > libspf_dlname and libspf_so_handle. Ok. > I would also make the function pointers static variables inside the > respective > stubs. Are you sure you want that? Then we can't avoid calling dlsym() every time one of our stubs is used. I'm not sure, but I think dlsym() involves a filesystem read access. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
