On 14/02/18 10:58, Jakob Hirsch via Exim-dev wrote:
> Anyway, I wonder why we need two base64 decoding functions. Sure, they
> serve different purposes, but the inner parts mostly do the same (apart
> from error handling). Shouldn't we consolidate this?
> Any objections?
Consolidation is good, so long as we're assured that the definition
of the base-64 method being used in the two cases is the same.
I think there's more than one alphabet in common use, for different
purposes... But if this turns out to be the case, perhaps a merged
routine could handle either.
Some microbenchmarking wouldn't go amiss, along with the usual
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##