Ian Eiloart wrote: > --On 17 May 2006 13:34:13 +0200 David Saez Padros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hi !! >> >> If you don't mind using perl functions: >> >> http://www.teuton.org/~ejm/exim_surbl/ >> > > Won't this suffer the same performance hit as SpamAssassin? It's also perl. > > Yes - that's why I'm interested in it. I want to reject as much as I can before I have to run Spamassassin to reduce load levels.
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
