On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:18:10AM +0200, Daniel Tiefnig wrote: > Hej, > <snip> > > Oh, one second thing: > Exim also said: "(result of an earlier callout reused)". But RFC 2821 > says (section 4.5.4.1, Par. 9): "More significantly, 5yz responses to > the MAIL command MUST NOT be cached.". Hmmm. >
I found that interesting, has anyone got anything further to say about it? Steven. -- To vacillate or not to vacillate, that is the question ... or is it? -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
