David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 19:52 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote: > >>David Woodhouse wrote: >> >>>Perhaps I should ship the exim package with its existing fairly basic >>>config (perhaps with some mailman stuff ifdeffed out), and then ship a >>>_separate_ all-singing, all-dancing exim config package which is capable >>>of just about everything? And perhaps that package could be based on the >>>Debian configuration stuff? >> >>Opinion: the world doesn't need another Debian. If they want that, they >>can go there. > > > Yeah, I certainly wouldn't want to have something that baroque as the > _default_ configuration when Fedora users install Exim. I was wondering > about an _optional_ package, or library of stuff they can cut and paste, > or something. >
Unless you are one of the principal maintainers of the Exim-related debconf / Cpanel / <other?> speecializations [1], I suspect they would want do it over anyway so as to maintain consistency and style with the rest. Functionality, too, one hopes... Presumptions, all, of course.... ;-) Bill [1] There! I DID change that word... -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
