W B Hacker wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > >>On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 19:52 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote: >> >> >>>David Woodhouse wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Perhaps I should ship the exim package with its existing fairly basic >>>>config (perhaps with some mailman stuff ifdeffed out), and then ship a >>>>_separate_ all-singing, all-dancing exim config package which is capable >>>>of just about everything? And perhaps that package could be based on the >>>>Debian configuration stuff? >>> >>>Opinion: the world doesn't need another Debian. If they want that, they >>>can go there. >> >> >>Yeah, I certainly wouldn't want to have something that baroque as the >>_default_ configuration when Fedora users install Exim. I was wondering >>about an _optional_ package, or library of stuff they can cut and paste, >>or something. >> > > > Unless you are one of the principal maintainers of the Exim-related debconf / > Cpanel / <other?> speecializations [1], I suspect they would want do it over > anyway so as to maintain consistency and style with the rest. Functionality, > too, one hopes... > > Presumptions, all, of course.... > > ;-) > > Bill > > [1] There! I DID change that word... >
SB 'specializations' And I due two halve a spill chequer, I just fur cat 2 U's it! Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
