Le mer 25 oct 2006 15:49:32 CEST, « Dave Evans » à écrit :
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:40:42PM +0200, Beber wrote:Is there good reason on a common usage to disallow any connection with HELO instead of EHLO ?There's a good reason /not/ to do that - RFC2821: "However, for compatibility with older conforming implementations, SMTP clients and servers MUST support the original HELO mechanisms as a fallback."
Hum.. Yes. But: Could it be enable only when a ESMTP failed ? Cause I want that people USE auth, and auth with SMTP is not possible.
-- Beber -- Email / Jabber (+GMail) : beber^^meleeweb.net http://www.meleeweb.net
pgpUjzhCX7ehv.pgp
Description: Signature numérique PGP
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
