On 25/10/06, Beber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le mer 25 oct 2006 15:49:32 CEST, « Dave Evans » à écrit : > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:40:42PM +0200, Beber wrote: > >> Is there good reason on a common usage to disallow any connection with > >> HELO instead of EHLO ? > > > > There's a good reason /not/ to do that - RFC2821: > > > > "However, for compatibility with older conforming implementations, SMTP > > clients and servers MUST support the original HELO mechanisms as a > > fallback." > > Hum.. Yes. But: Could it be enable only when a ESMTP failed ? Cause I > want that people USE auth, and auth with SMTP is not possible.
Then you're trying to fix the wrong problem. require authenticated = * in some ACL would ensure that no unauthenticated mail is accepted. If you're sure that's what you want... Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
