Wakko Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fr 24 Nov 2006 02:41:13 CET): > Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > But in transports and routers you can remove headers. And probably in > > the system filter (but then the mail already passed the ACL, didn't > > it?). > > Good, I'm glad I wasn't missing anything. It would be nice to beable to do > this. I was trying to setup something at work to change the importance of a > message and an ACL was the first thought. Unfortunately, add_headers just > adds new ones. MUAs that will be receiving this is outlook 2000. I didn't > test which ones it uses first. I suppose I could always have it added after > received.
Here is some blueprint how you could try it:
...
warn
add_header = X-SECRET-Importance: 4711
And later in the transport (I'm using the amavis transport here, because
all incoming messages have to pass it):
amavis:
driver = ...
headers_remove = Importance
headers_add = Importance: $h_x-secret-importance
(I'm not sure, probably you can even remove the x-secret-importance
header in the transport - it's how I interpret the 43.17 section).
But again, I'm not sure, what we do with spamassassin is only similar, not the
same!
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -----------------------------------------
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---------------
gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
