Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Wakko Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fr 24 Nov 2006 02:41:13 CET): > > Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > > But in transports and routers you can remove headers. And probably in > > > the system filter (but then the mail already passed the ACL, didn't > > > it?). > > > > Good, I'm glad I wasn't missing anything. It would be nice to beable to do > > this. I was trying to setup something at work to change the importance of a > > message and an ACL was the first thought. Unfortunately, add_headers just > > adds new ones. MUAs that will be receiving this is outlook 2000. I didn't > > test which ones it uses first. I suppose I could always have it added after > > received. > > Here is some blueprint how you could try it: > > ... > warn > add_header = X-SECRET-Importance: 4711 > > > And later in the transport (I'm using the amavis transport here, because > all incoming messages have to pass it): > > > amavis: > driver = ... > headers_remove = Importance > headers_add = Importance: $h_x-secret-importance
I did not want to have to do it that way. The setup I have, depending on if the user is local or in sql, or if they have a .procmailrc or not, depends on which router handles it and which transport handles it. That sounds like I'd have to dupicate it 4 times. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals Got Gas??? -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
