Marc Perkel wrote: > Yes - I was asking on behalf of someone else who was concerned if there > had been any history of Exim security holes. I searched Google and there > was one back in 1997, but didn't see any since. My answer is that Exim > is as secure if not more so tan Qmail.
Which is a nonsense statement without qualification. If an exim install is accidentally configured to be an open relay, but a qmail install isn't, which is more secure? Your question last time, and this time, lack enough context to be meaningful. -- Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam & anti-virus Consultant | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | filtering. Inoculate antibodymx.net | m: +447896578023 | your mail system. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
