On 05/01/07, Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Bowyer wrote: > > On 05/01/07, Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you'd ask for a personal advise, SORBS is nothing to be trusted as a > >> blacklist. > > > > They have 17 different lists. Is this broad-brush 'advice' to be > > applied to all 17? > > > > Unfortunately, yes. :(
You've used them all, and experienced FPs? What about dul? > I am sorry to tell that, but is you use sorbs as a first line of defense > and reject with 5xx on this only, be prepared to reject a bunch of > legitimate mails. > I prefer to use them on a basis like "if you are listed on sorbs spam > and the callout doesn't verify, and you are attaching an image, just > forget about sending me mail". So they are useful, no doubt about this, > but just cannot be trusted. What's you're evidence for this? Broken down by the 17 separate lists. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
