Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sa 06 Jan 2007 00:40:50 CET): > > > Peter Bowyer wrote: > > > You are *listed*. If your listing doesn't meet SORBS' criteria, > > there's a removal form which doesn't require registration (I just > > checked). They accept de-listing requests from registered netblock > > owners or end-users, and process them automatically if the rDNS > > matches Matt's suggested naming conventions. Sounds like a solid > > process to me - have you had problems with it? > > I had some clients that were awarded static IPs from the most used ISP > in Belgium, and these IP were just blacklisted by SORBS as DUL. They may > have been DUL IPs in the past, and I see no reason why they shouldn't. > The problem is they were still blacklisted on SORBS as DUL in the time
Hm, what I understand is: static IPs are listed if they are designated
to residential users. (?? do I use the right words?) Here in .de you
can get a static IP on your DSL for almost no money. The connected
systems are of about the same "quality" as for dynamic connected DSL.
This way I see some sense in listing theses addresses per default and
ask for a manual delisting procedure.
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -----------------------------------------
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---------------
gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
