Hello Sander, Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sa 06 Jan 2007 01:33:03 CET): > Quoting Heiko Schlittermann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > what I understand from SRS is: > > If I use SRS for outgoing messages, bounces to messages I sent should be > > addressed to SRS-"encoded" recipients, not to real real recipients. > .... > A DSN originates from a null sender to stop loops, normal email should > (again in my honest opinion) never be sent from a null sender address. > So i drop every DSN to addresses that are 'protected' by SRS and that > doesn't meet my SRS policy. > > > Who is wrong here? Should SORBS use valid non-null sender addresses or > > should I forget thinking about SRS? > > I'd say SORBS.
Thank you :)
> > [ In case SORBS is wrong - does anybody here know some folks from SORBS
> > to ask for a fix? ]
>
> Better would be to implement a whitelist in your SRS-check, like i did.
> You'll find it hard to convince people to change their setup because you
> have a problem.
Yes, we're always fixing our servers to cope with problems of others :-(
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -----------------------------------------
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---------------
gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
