--On 30 October 2008 16:58:38 +0100 Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 12:32 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote: >> That's useful. It's shocking that most of these banks haven't >> implemented SPF. > > well, perhaps they don't want their customers to lose their e-mail > randomly... Maybe, but when their customers don't know who their email is coming from, maybe it's better they don't get any at all. Better than losing all their money. > > DKIM is another story, of course. > > On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:21:48 +0000, neil wrote: >> Yes I know that SPF etc breaks stuff <cue furious debate about >> forwarding>, but I would have though that in the few cases where people >> set up deliberate forwarding they could whitelist, versus the millions >> of phishing mails sent each day. > > no, people can't whitelist on their own. good luck asking your e-mail > provider to add exceptions to their SPF handling. also good luck > explaining why this is needed to your grandma. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148 -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
