--On 31 October 2008 01:29:35 +0800 W B Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Eiloart wrote: >> > *snip* > > > BTW - that '99%' the Wank Mangler mentioned probably don't have anything > worth stealing in their bank (we are talking the UK and recent days, are > we not?). We're talking the UK a couple of years ago, but the robo-calling policy is recent. It's a bank that hasn't yet suffered from the recent troubles. As far as we know. Absence of shareholders, as a co-operative, and an ethical investment policy may have something to do with it. It has been hit by insider fraud, though. > BTW - there must be thousands of UID:PWD compromises, perhaps tens of > thousands - for each one that results in a loss. > > Unless the *perps* are as foolish as the WinLusers they keylogged, or > bought info on - they are only going to risk exposure for serious money, > and probably hit many targets at the same narrow time window before > submerging again. > > Who knows how much of THAT might yet be lying in wait for what they view > as the opportune time to strike? > > Or was executed during the high-traffic days of the current tsunami. > > :-( > > Bill -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148 -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
