Mike Cardwell wrote: > Marc Perkel wrote: > > >>> Not spammers - forgers. Providing a way to defeat an anti-forgery >>> mechanism wouldn't be my choice. But hey, if that's what you want.... >>> >> I'm thinking that forgers would be less of a problem that false >> positives produced by forwarded email. >> > > I'm thinking the opposite. >
Then you would merely NOT use the feature and I would. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
