Marc Perkel wrote: > > Mike Cardwell wrote: >> Marc Perkel wrote: >> >> >>>> Not spammers - forgers. Providing a way to defeat an anti-forgery >>>> mechanism wouldn't be my choice. But hey, if that's what you want.... >>>> >>> I'm thinking that forgers would be less of a problem that false >>> positives produced by forwarded email. >>> >> I'm thinking the opposite. >> > > Then you would merely NOT use the feature and I would. >
Marc, While 'bending' tools into unanticipated usage, here then, is a link to what should make a far more comfortable toilet-seat than the ones Home Depot sell: http://www.antiquemystique.com/pages/8034_jpg.htm Mind - it could be a bit of a chore to clean up afterwards. So too, with a bastardized spf... Bill -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
