Andrew Lewis wrote: > It seems that the "control = submission" directive is ineffectual when a > message has an empty envelope-from and that this is by design. As a result, > undeliverable bounce messages generated by machines that use me as a > smarthost end up frozen on my queue (rather than being returned to the > address the user authenticated with as I would like). > Indeed it is by design. If I get you right, if you get a NDN (none-delivery-notification, or for the discussion, any other type of message with empty sender, like out of office) which you can not delivery, you like to bounce that? That is a recipe for trouble, meaning you can play ping-pong all day long... Don't do it!
If you don't like them on the queue, delete them. If memory serves me right, they will expire anyway, that time should be adjustable, I guess. Oliver -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
