> Indeed it is by design. If I get you right, if you get a NDN
> (none-delivery-notification, or for the discussion, any other type of
> message with empty sender, like out of office) which you can not
> delivery, you like to bounce that? That is a recipe for trouble, meaning
> you can play ping-pong all day long... Don't do it!

I want to discourage administrators of remote mail systems that are using me 
as a smarthost from sending these messages and if I direct the delivery 
failure notifications at them they should at least be made aware that they 
are generating these, which is a step in the right direction (my queue 
remaining un-polluted is a happy side-effect).

The ID they authenticate with will always be a mailbox I control, so I would 
know for sure I can deliver mail there.

Mailer in question handles authenticated SMTP relay only.

-AL. 


-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to