Peter Funk <[email protected]> (Mi 03 Feb 2016 11:14:47 CET): > I think consumed resources (CPU cycles, memory, disk I/O, electricity) > might become interesting when it comes to compare different MTAs for > a high volume scenario on a server at some cloud service provider. > (depending on the cost model those providers are using to calculate > their billing of course). > > I believe: It will be very difficult to construct a realistic > MTA-benchmark suite with reproducible results. There are way too > many different interacting factors. > > > Would anybody be willing to share performance stats? > > (In a first step: submit the results from a tailored eximstats output?) > > What kind of information do you expect?
That's the question ….
For a start probably size of the queue in relation to the queue time of
the messages delivered at any given time.
That is, the impact of a huge queue …
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
