A paper from 2007 studies the performance of SMTP servers (Exim,
Postfix, Sendmail, ...) and takes in consideration the
anti-spam-measures. Could be an inspiration for further tests:
http://www.hawai.hu/doc/BencsathR07cts.pdf
Cheers,
Joachim
On 2016-02-05 10:18, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Klaus Ethgen <[email protected]> (Mi 03 Feb 2016 11:27:59 CET):
…
Unfortunately there is no real statistics about that available. It
would
also be somehow hard as it depends on the internal processing. So
naturally the throughput would be lower when doing spam checking as it
would be without.
Yes, inbound probably is not comparable, as I suspect, the impact of
content scanning overrides everything.
But once we have the message in the queue, it should be delivered
*fast*. That Exim does normally, but if something breaks and the queue
fills up …
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
