Klaus Ethgen <[email protected]> (Mi 03 Feb 2016 11:27:59 CET): … > Unfortunately there is no real statistics about that available. It would > also be somehow hard as it depends on the internal processing. So > naturally the throughput would be lower when doing spam checking as it > would be without.
Yes, inbound probably is not comparable, as I suspect, the impact of
content scanning overrides everything.
But once we have the message in the queue, it should be delivered
*fast*. That Exim does normally, but if something breaks and the queue
fills up …
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
