Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> (Do 27 Jul 2017 16:04:30 CEST): > On 26/07/17 12:38, Lena--- via Exim-users wrote: > >> Given the resounding silence from volunteers, I'm tempted to retire > >> in the next release _everything_ apart from the current set of > >> representatives in the buildfarm. > >> > >> That would be: Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, SunOS5. > > > > Perhaps keep DragonFly and Darwin, but unmaintained and unchanged, > > they patch as needed. > > I don't think that would be good, as it maintains the illusion > that those builds are actually tested - which, lacking buildfarm > or other participation, I have no confidence in.
I'd see an even more strict approach: A platform Exim should support
needs
- a constantly working buildfarm animal with a responsive maintainer
- to provide a system where the developers can login, compile and
test (on a on demand base at least), as I do not see us fixing
things for platforms where the only feedback comes from the
buildfarm output
--
Heiko
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
