On 26/05/18 15:05, Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users wrote:
> Well, this "info@"-address is a forward to many recipients, not just one...

Oh, a mail-exploder.  OK, no cutthrough routing possible.  This is
effectively a mailinglist, and you need to put real effort into
curating it.  Things like: on the slightest evidence of dodgyness
- including, but not limited to, bad rDNS, bad HELO, bad dnsbl,
bad sender-verify-callout, perhaps even unwhitelisted-senders -
divert to a quarantine queue for manual vetting.

And consider just rejecting on those grounds, too.


Or, as Lena suggests, for Google use a POP-sucker rather than
SMTP forwarding.  But that means telling Google some credentials
for your box, and providing POP access (I strongly suggest you
create a/some dedicated account(s) for that, with the credentials not
used for any other purpose).  We are, of course, assuming you
have control of the Google account(s) concerned.
-- 
Cheers,
  Jeremy

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
  • [exim] Avoidi... Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users
    • Re: [exi... Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
      • Re: ... Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users
        • ... Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
          • ... Jasen Betts via Exim-users
    • Re: [exi... Lena--- via Exim-users
    • Re: [exi... Always Learning via Exim-users
      • Re: ... Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users
      • Re: ... Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users
        • ... Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT & Internet) via Exim-users
    • Re: [exi... Klaus Maria Pfeiffer via Exim-users

Reply via email to