>> Only if I follow the hint "Invoke menu with right button." I will >> get a menu: >> >> Decode part as MIME >> Save a multipart/alternative... >> Print a multipart/alternative as text... >> Show alternative 1: text/plain >> Show alternative 2: multipart/mixed >> >> Selecting alternative 2 will then show all parts, in the example >> here: > >That's actually standards-compliant. If the attachments are part of >the multipart/mixed, they should not be displayed if the MUA is displaying >the text/plain.
Well, I agree it is "standards compliant", in that it's a validly-formatted MIME message, but is it RIGHT? I am not sure. My understanding is that the alternative parts are supposed to be different versions of the same thing. So text/plain vs text/html, fine, that makes sense. But is text/plain vs 'text/html plus a few extra files with a disposition of "attachment"' the RIGHT idea? I would argue that it is not, that the multipart/alternative should just encapsulate the text/plain and the text/html. --Ken _______________________________________________ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
