Jeanette ,
For My testing which install did you do custom, workstation, or server.
This would help me a great deal. Because I do not want to submit a bug
report unless it absolutely necessary.
Cheers, and thanx for your time.
Eric Peters
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com/
GCS d s: a- C+++ U++++ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N++ o+ K w+++
O- M-- V PS+++ PE Y PGP t++ 5+ X+++ R tv+ b++ DI++ D+
G e h++ r+ z++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeanette Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] BitchX Possible bug UPDATE!
> I don't know I am using the BX rpm that came with Linux and works fine.
> Jeanette
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eric Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 4:56 PM
> Subject: [expert] BitchX Possible bug UPDATE!
>
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > The problem I been having with BitchX is somewhat over. I went to
> > freshmeat.net and downloaded BitchX-75p3-4.i386.rpm installed the RPM
and
> > guess what it works. So it dose look like a bug with the rpm in the
> distro.
> >
> > The reason why I have to get it in RPM not tarball is because I'm having
> > problems compiling it, I get a whole bunch of these.
> >
> > commands.c: In function `echocmd':
> > commands.c:2001: warning: implicit declaration of function `tputs'
> >
> > I have yet not tried a diffrent program as of yet "no time" but will try
> > tonight.
> >
> > Eric Peters
> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > Version: 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com/
> > GCS d s: a- C+++ U++++ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N++ o+ K w+++
> > O- M-- V PS+++ PE Y PGP t++ 5+ X+++ R tv+ b++ DI++ D+
> > G e h++ r+ z++
> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> >
> >
> >
>
