Eric its a custom install.
Jeanette
Eric Peters wrote:
>
> Jeanette ,
>
> For My testing which install did you do custom, workstation, or server.
> This would help me a great deal. Because I do not want to submit a bug
> report unless it absolutely necessary.
>
> Cheers, and thanx for your time.
> Eric Peters
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com/
> GCS d s: a- C+++ U++++ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N++ o+ K w+++
> O- M-- V PS+++ PE Y PGP t++ 5+ X+++ R tv+ b++ DI++ D+
> G e h++ r+ z++
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeanette Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 5:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [expert] BitchX Possible bug UPDATE!
>
> > I don't know I am using the BX rpm that came with Linux and works fine.
> > Jeanette
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Eric Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 4:56 PM
> > Subject: [expert] BitchX Possible bug UPDATE!
> >
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > The problem I been having with BitchX is somewhat over. I went to
> > > freshmeat.net and downloaded BitchX-75p3-4.i386.rpm installed the RPM
> and
> > > guess what it works. So it dose look like a bug with the rpm in the
> > distro.
> > >
> > > The reason why I have to get it in RPM not tarball is because I'm having
> > > problems compiling it, I get a whole bunch of these.
> > >
> > > commands.c: In function `echocmd':
> > > commands.c:2001: warning: implicit declaration of function `tputs'
> > >
> > > I have yet not tried a diffrent program as of yet "no time" but will try
> > > tonight.
> > >
> > > Eric Peters
> > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > > Version: 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com/
> > > GCS d s: a- C+++ U++++ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N++ o+ K w+++
> > > O- M-- V PS+++ PE Y PGP t++ 5+ X+++ R tv+ b++ DI++ D+
> > > G e h++ r+ z++
> > > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
