Yes I was
:)
Cheers,
Eric Peters
Admin linuxsystems.net
(503)434-5871 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com/
GCS d s: a- C+++ U++++ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N++ o+ K w+++
O- M-- V PS+++ PE Y PGP t++ 5+ X+++ R tv+ b++ DI++ D+
G e h++ r+ z++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
----- Original Message -----
From: Axalon Bloodstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] BitchX Possible bug UPDATE!
>
> Forgive me for being forgetful but, you are the one that orignaly report a
> bug with BX segfault yes?
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Eric Peters wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > The problem I been having with BitchX is somewhat over. I went to
> > freshmeat.net and downloaded BitchX-75p3-4.i386.rpm installed the RPM
and
> > guess what it works. So it dose look like a bug with the rpm in the
distro.
> >
> > The reason why I have to get it in RPM not tarball is because I'm having
> > problems compiling it, I get a whole bunch of these.
> >
> > commands.c: In function `echocmd':
> > commands.c:2001: warning: implicit declaration of function `tputs'
> >
> > I have yet not tried a diffrent program as of yet "no time" but will try
> > tonight.
> >
> > Eric Peters
> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > Version: 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com/
> > GCS d s: a- C+++ U++++ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N++ o+ K w+++
> > O- M-- V PS+++ PE Y PGP t++ 5+ X+++ R tv+ b++ DI++ D+
> > G e h++ r+ z++
> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
> --Axalon
>
