I build quite a few computers a work for our clients. I refuse to use wd drives in
Linux computers anymore. I get errors like that on about 30% of the drives. And like
Civileme wrote I got a 3 gig drive that thought it was an 8 gig drive.  I put that
one in a windows machine and actually got about 6.5 gig on it before it crashed.
then it wouldn't come back up at all. just made clicking noises.

The techs at WD know me by name already I call them with complaints so much.



Civileme wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> > Here's a interesting snip after running "fdisk /dev/hdb".
> >
> > <clip>
> > The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 1247. There is
> > nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024, and could
> > in certain setups cause problems with: 1) software that runs at
> > boot time (e.g., LILO) 2) booting and partitioning software from
> > other OSs    (e.g., DOS FDISK, OS/2 FDISK)
> > hdb: read_intr: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest
> > Error } hdb: read_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError },
> > LBAsect=15390270, sector=15390270 end_request: I/O error, dev
> > 03:40 (hdb), sector 15390270
> > Unable to read /dev/hdb
> > </clip>
> >
> > This is a WD 10GB drive, EIDE btw.
>
> WD is wonderful about taking back bad ones...  They have a DOS-based disk
> utility for testing that might show some information, downloadable from their
> site, and some techs that love to discover the output of that program over the
> phone.  I remember a 3G which would not work in almost identical fashion to this
> and their test utility read it as an 8.4G  (yeppers, the wrong info chip on the
> i/f board)  They took a credit card number overt the phone, sent a brand new 4G
> to replace it and gave me 30 days for the old one to get back before charging my
> card.
>
> Of course, my preference is that they build them right the first time, but few
> companies are into that quality mentality yet.  At least they know how to treat
> customers.
>
> Civileme
>
> I also tried fdisk from
> > Win98,
> > and it wouldn't do anything but hang forever.  Personally, I
> > think
> > it's hosed.  Any ideas welcome.  Just a FYI, but I've tried all
> > of
> > the normal things, like making it a primary, cable, power, and
> > even
> > a new motherboard. (I was going to upgrade soon anyway;)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dana

Reply via email to