I was thinking of something similar, only without the business plan:)  For
one, I think the phone co. might try & charge more for the line, since you
would be in effect competing with them instead of simply using their
services.  I don't know, maybe all the monopoly stuff figures in there &
it'd be cheaper (get telecom/isp rates).  Instead of having a pay service,
have it be more like napster.  Ok, not really, but yeah.  If you are
operating a gateway, you have use of the service.  As a gateway operator,
you can add <x number> of people to the network.  That way, it's not a
commercial endeavor & you can use a residential line.  But before anything
like that can happen, the software has to be written...  BTW, wouldn't you
also need a voice modem?

Joseph Red
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rusty Carruth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 7:33 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [expert] My last word on Linux Telephony


> "Praedor Tempus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > It would be nice to see a non-hardware based answer.  It would not be
optimal
> > but it would be cheaper and easier for many people.
>
> Um, I'm confused.
>
> We need to connect from the internet using ip to the PSTN using
analog/voice.
>
> Using software only????
>
> I know we can do a LOT with software, but there's this little problem
> of getting the bits across to the PSTN 'network' that will require at
> least a little hardware ;-)
>
> While perusing this thread, I considered the idea of a network of folks
> who had IP-to-PSTN gateways that would allow others to use them for free,
> but the problem there is - I have to either pay for a second phone line
> so I can let other people use it for free, or I have to allow strangers
> to tie up my primary phone line at random times for unknown periods
> while strangers use it!
>
> Hmm.  How about this - first, we'll assume business rates because the
> phone company would want to stick us for the higher rate - lets say
> thats $45/month (high, I hope!).  Lets assume usage is 10% of the time,
> and we want to break even at that usage rate.  For the sake of argument,
> we'll use a 28-day month (I'm trying to find the least you can reasonably
> charge to break even here, so I'm trying to estimate high on cost and low
> on usage/month).
>
> So, thats $45*.10/(28*24*60) or - what 1.1 cents/minute?
>
> So, if we had a billing/payment method where we could bill folks at say
> 1.2 - 1.3 cents/minute with no other billing cost then we'd have something
> here.  (I've added a tiny bit to cover the cost of electricity, initial
> purchase of hardware, etc).
>
> Anybody want to start setting this up?
>
> rc
>
>
> Rusty Carruth          Email:     [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: (480) 345-3621  SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE
> FAX:   (480) 345-8793             7855 S. River Parkway, Suite 116
> Ham: N7IKQ @ 146.82+,pl 162.2     Tempe, AZ 85284-1825
> ICBM: 33 20' 44"N   111 53' 47"W
>


Reply via email to