Praedor Tempus wrote:
>
> I am considering it however, it is merely on my list. At the top of that
> list is a new videocard.
>
> I wouldn't mind using CPU cycles for this rather than a dedicated card, at
> least for a while. I do not make that many longdistance calls. I do travel
> some and it would be nice to always be nothing more than a local call away
> from my wife or other family members. Thus, if I wanted to really use the
> card for my purposes, I would need a pcmcia version for my laptop AND the pci
> card for my desktop. Thus, I prefer a cheap and transportable solution
> (software solution).
>
> On Monday 05 February 2001 23:10, Traci Collins wrote:
> > Praedor Tempus wrote:
> > > A quicknet linejack PCI audio telephony card runs $160.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.
> >
> > They do have Linux drivers and discounted Linux developer prices
> > however. If my money is going to disappear in someone's pocket it seems
> > like a much nicer sort of pocket to put it into.
That is exactly what I am talking about. That is why I want to emulate
the card at best. Since, I am a great hardware (guru) I should probably
invest in buying the card just so that I can "map" out the hardware
chips and use "scientific" measures to "reconstruct" how the card works
logically.
I don't mind buying the card. It is just as soon as I saw that it was
internal PC and PCI only...
the implications! ...I mean ..the limitations!
--
.--. `
|__| .-------. Altoine Barker
|=.| |.-----.| Maximum Time, Inc
|--| ||$SEND|| Chicago Based Enterprise
| | |'-----'| http://www.maximumtime.com
|__|~')_____('
