I'd have to concur with Rob. Postgres seems to be a very feature rich and stable database. We are looking to moving some of our Oracle databases to it. MySQL seems to get much more press, but it simply lacks many features required for serious database use (stored procedures, transactions, sub-selects, etc). This is not intended to start a Postgres vs MySQL war (as both have zealots). MySQL is very good at the things it does. But because of it's limitations, it doesn't fit our specific needs.
Joe On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:11:21 +0000 Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 19 February 2002 13:43, Harold wrote: > > >And of > > course if you're a self proclaimed masacist you could always take a look > > at Postgres. > > Postgres (in my experience) has always been very stable and easy > to learn and use. Probably the most so of all RDBMs I have used. > I dont know what experience (or closed minded ?? viewpoint) Harold > has to justify masocism in regard to postgres (maybee he used a very > old version a long time ago - ?). > Anyway ignore such pointless insults. Take a look yourself and make up > your own mind. > > Rob > > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
