�Joseph Braddock� sagte am 2002-02-20 um 19:16:20 -0600 : > I'd have to concur with Rob. Postgres seems to be a very feature rich and stable >database. We are looking to moving some of our Oracle databases to it. MySQL seems >to get much more press, but it simply lacks many features required for serious >database use (stored procedures, transactions, sub-selects, etc). This is not >intended to start a Postgres vs MySQL war (as both have zealots). MySQL is very good >at the things it does. But because of it's limitations, it doesn't fit our specific >needs. >
Well, MySQL *has* transactions and stored procedures (not as good as Oracles, though). And I think sub-selects are also available in 4.x, no? Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die g�nstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 4 hours 47 minutes
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
