On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 13:16 -0700, Deryk Barker wrote:
> Thus spake Alexander Skwar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > �Alastair Scott� sagte am 2002-05-06 um 15:22:12 +0100 :
> > > Although it's written in the characteristic The Register style (halfway
> >
> > Well, it's a very bad review, indeed. In the sense, that the author
> > should not bash Mdk for something that's only the authors fault.
> >
> > He complains, that the kernel .config doesn't reflect reality.
> >
> > Well, did he use the correct one from /boot? He doesn't say so, but I
> > assume he didn't.
> >
> > This alone let's me assume that he doesn't have a clue and just wants to
> > bash 8.2. Fine.
>
> Well, OK, but he did apparently like 8.1 a great deal. He's obviously
> not simply out to get Mandrake.
The .config issue was not the only issue he addressed in the review. And
to get a real picture about user's various opinions about 8.2 you should
read the last 4 weeks postings in the Mandrake newsgroup.
OK, most postings came from users who were the problem themselves but a
lot of smaller or larger faults are for real. The most addressed topic is
the (assumed) non-existant QA at MandrakeSoft.
wobo
--
Registered Linux User 228909 Powered By Mandrake Linux 8.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft, Windows, Bugs, Lacking Features, IRQ Conflicts, System
Crashes, Non-Functional Multitasking and The Blue Screen of Death
("BSOD") are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corp., Redmond,
Washington, USA.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
