The LSB option on install is for installing the test suite for testing LSB compliance and is not required to be LSB compliant. As for whether the D/L version is or not, I am not sure as I haven't read the latest spec, but since the ProSuite is a superset of the D/L version, unless something is not included with the D/L version that would be required for LSB compliance, one would expect that it is, too.
Joeb -------Original Message------- From: Miark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 12/29/02 03:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] Difference between distros > > James, Speaking of which, what exactly is the deal with LSB comlpiance? The LSB website says that the ProSuite specifically is compliant. Does that mean the d/l version is not? Also I seem to remember LSB being a package category during the installation of 9. Do I remember correctly? If so, why is it an option and not automatic? Miark On 29 Dec 2002 17:11:58 -0800 James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not really and with the advent of the LSB the versions that are meeting > LSB compliance (RH and MDK are the leaders here) are less and less > different. The diffence isn't the tree structure... but rather the > leaves. (pardon my pun) but executables are in bin libs are in lib etc > etc... > > James >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
