thanks much for replying........

I will check on ur recommendation 1 & 2, i had not
done that! I will report my findings.

I have however, checked #3. I had it on 100FD, i now
changed it to 100HD, after finding that switch port
was at 100HD. No much improvement, however. 

Currently, using net_monitor, on a local 100Mb LAN, i
am getting only an average of 800KB/sec as a receiving
speed!! 

--- Joerg Mertin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Tru64 User wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> have you checked the block sizes of all involved
> Filesystems ?
> Some Hints that come to my mind:
> 
> 1. If the filesystem has huge blocks, increase the
> Block-sizes on the NFS 
> transfers in the /etc/fstab ...
> 
> 2. Have you performed a bonnie-test on the disks on
> both systems ?
> I bet you'll have on BOX 2 very slow write-speeds.
> Most probably due to a 
> not well configured Harddisk drivers. Check out
> using hdparm -I /dev/??? 
> <raid-device>
> 
> It is possible that you'll have to install the
> 2.4.18Kernel from the 
> mandrake 8.2 on Box 2. remember - Bleeding Edge is
> nothing for productio 
> Systems - and I wouldn't use a 2.4.20 kernel in a
> working environement.
> 
> 3. Eventually the Network-Card has not been
> configured to 100MBit 
> connection. Try out checking the network-Card speed
> on the System.
> 
> Cheers
> 
>       Joerg
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Am having a heck of a time trying to figure out a
> > bottleneck for NFS transfers.
> > I have 2 Mandy boxes, acting only as NFS file
> servers.
> > 
> > BOX1:
> > 1.8Ghz, Mandt 8.2 Kernel 2.4.18, reiserfs, NFSv3
> on
> > 100MbitFD  [ NIC:Intel Corp. 82820 (ICH2) Chipset
> > Ethernet Controller (rev 03) ]
> > 
> > 
> > BOX2:
> > 2.4Ghz Dual Xeon Processors, Mandy 9.0 Kernel
> 2.4.20,
> > LVM is being used, file system is still reiserfs,
> > NFSv3 on 100MbitFD [ NIC:Intel Corp. 82557/8/9
> > [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 0d) ]
> > 
> > -Both run iptables, no effect on transfer rates
> when
> > iptables is on/off on either.
> > 
> > Rate of transfer differs significantly!! They both
> > serve disks (1Tb) to a single tru64 Unix server
> (Using
> > IDE Raid, same configuration of RAIDcard and
> storage
> > box)
> > 
> > a 77GB transfer from Tru64Unix disk to an NFS
> mounted
> > disk from BOX1, took about 8hrs.
> > 
> > A 77GB transfer from Tru64Unix disk to an NFS
> mounted
> > disk from BOX2, has taken two days and counting!!
> > 
> > No NFS errors reported. Everything seems to be
> working
> > perfectly!, except for the transfer rate!
> > Even utlizing the RAID array without LVM, but on
> BOX2,
> > yields the same very slow transfer rates! Is it
> > something with Mandy9.0? or what else could help
> in
> > troubleshooting the issue here?
> > 
> > Clueless Richard,
> > 
> > _Thanks
> > 
> > 
> > =====
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
> now.
> > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Joerg Mertin              :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
>             (Home)|
> | in Neuch�tel/Schweiz      : 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]            (Work)| 
> | Stardust's LiNUX System   :                       
>                   |
> | PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice & Fax: +41(0)32
> / 725 52 54       |
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org
> 
> 
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
> 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> 


=====


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to