On Thursday 13 March 2003 11:39 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>
> A few questions tho... XFree86 4.3.0 is supposed to support the Radeon
> 9700 (to what extent... I couldn't find any info on their site). I
> think the agpgart might be the prob. I am wondering if the agpgart
> module supports at least the nforce (not the nforce2) chipset. If I am
> not mistaken it doesn't though it has been on the market for quite a
> while now. That is probably due to the lack of support from nvidia. I
> am thinking of helping reverse engineering the AGP part of the board so
> we could have support also for nforce2, but I dunno how to do that. I
> am a programmer myself but never went that deep in linux stuff. I would
> need all the help I can get on this matter.

You are correct, it is the 3D stuff that is not well upported.   I understand 
ATi is trying to do some drivers, but that seems a recent effort and they 
will need to understand the software engineering process for linux well 
enough to accomplish it, which may take a few failed efforts.

> Second question would be: Is there any chance to tell XFree
86 not to do
> those strict tests anymore? The system on which the problem is, is my
> "play station" so I am not that sad if linux gets trashed in the
> process (I can always reinstall and start all over again).
OK yes there is a way.  One method is examining DrakX/XFdrake code to find the 
differences between that and the standard XFree Server...  A somewhat simpler 
solution that might have the same effect is examining the XF86Config-4 file 
in /etc/X11/ and removing all unwanted modes/screens since it may be one of 
those that is causing the problem.

> Any chance of finding usefull stuff in implementing the agpgart for
> this board from the NVIDIA_kernel sources which builds the NVAGP? I've
> seen they provide a tarball and sorce rpm for unsupported linux
> versions, and their NVAGP is supposed to work with the nforce2...
>

Ummm, the tarball and source rpm have huge binareis embedded within.  The 
purpose of the "source" is to provide a wrapper for compiling as a kernel 
module, else they would be building binaries for EVERY new kernel issued.

> Best regards,
> Adrian

Good luck,

Civileme


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to