On Sun Mar 16, 2003 at 01:27:50AM +0000, Azrael wrote: > > Oh, absolutely... I agree with you 110% here. And part of our problem is a > > very small hardware budget (obviously, we need to pay developers first). So > > we don't have all the latest and greatest that people might be using; which > > is what makes the entire cooker process invaluable. We reach a broader > > range of hardware through cooker than we ever could otherwise. > > Each and every manufacturer of hardware ought to send mandrake samples > to use in testing. It's a new law I just made up, so tell them to send > it all now, 'cause I say so!! > > But sheesh, I would have though some/many of them would do it purely in > their own interests!
You'd think so. Unfortunately, hardware manufacturers can be more arrogant than software vendors sometimes... =) -- MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/ Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/ "lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import" {FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
