haven't tried that, and the only squid I have is on a 9.0 box (70 miles away, and I'm not brave enough to urpmi through that upgrade :-)
still, one messed up package does not equal a worthless distribution. Jack On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 09:53, Lawson, Jim wrote: > I have the same luck with 9.0. 9.1 bombed for me. Have you tried to install > sarg and run it with errors> Some thing about /var/www/sarg is a directory. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Avi Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] Mandrake 9.1 > > > Lawson, Jim wrote: > > > I hope Mandrake 9.1 is better than Mandrake 9.1. Mandrake 9.0 is great > from > > my experience with it. But 9.1 lacks a lot in stability. > > I have to wonder what is this observation based on. Mdk 9.1 is my first > mdk ever after using SuSE for many years. Admittedly I was forced to > use MDK by SuSE when it dropped support for my processor (VIA Nehemiah) > but I must tell you that mdk 9.1 impressed me quite a bit. I am using > it on a gateway machine to a small network providing firewall, nat, > imap, web based mail, a caching dns and a caching transparent web proxy. > It scans emails for virus and filters spam. It is on 24x7 and had no > problems at all. For few weeks, while setting up the box I was also > running KDE on it. Now however it is no longer booting into GUI since > it is a pure server. > > Avi > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
