On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 09:41, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Err, in following this thread my first thought is: isn't not supplying the > kernel source technically a violation of GPL? The HAVE to supply the source > and should make allowances (reductions in certain packages) if it is not > possible to put the source on one of the official distro CDs. Kernel source > is critical for many reasons, not leastwise to comply with GPL. > > praedor
No, the violation would be if it wasn't available at all. Since it is available via urpmi and or the web. (Which is the same way you get the download iso's) it's not a violation. If you notice, none of the iso's have src rpms. No problem they are available in the same manor as the binaries. 'Download. Jaems > - -- > "Our ship is in the hands of pilots who are steering directly under full sail > for a rock. The whole crew may see this course to violate our liberties in > full view if they look the right way." > - --Samuel Adams, 1771 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/jsowaKr9sJYeTxgRAh8WAKCOIDlJUS5C3yGOQAQcPbSUgkvtLACfUubB > IS5qfJ4ABPseslD87RmTwXQ= > =fXZN > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
