On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 17:27, Phil G. wrote: > 2 questions: > > 1. Doesn't RH have to make the source available? I thought that was the > deal with GPL.
they have to make it available in the same way they make binaries available. Beyond that it's choice. They also have to send patches back to the author. Available and at no charge are two different animals. > > 2. Just what does "SuSE" stand for, anyway ;-) No one knows *grin* > > Phil > > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:19:27 +0100, Wolfgang Bornath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > John Wilson schrieb am Mon, 3 Nov 2003 23:45:43 -0800: > > > >> ...we both know which is better in that enviornment, don't we? :) > > > > Uh, excuse me, could you help me on that? > > ;-) > > > > Saw the big RH booth at the LWC&E in Frankfurt last week. Lots of suits > > with red hats crawling around, jabbering with other suits. They had many > > small demo points for the various offers and Red Hat Linux products. > > > > There was NOT ONE SINGLE demo point of a normal desktop Linux > > distribution. It was enterprise all over. Not even a demo point for > > Fedora! > > > > Thinking back to last years LWC&E here I remember lots of normal > > visitors crowded at the RH stand and RH giving away demo CDs for the > > hunter-gatherers. Or even this year's LinuxTag it was the same picture. > > Even some guys running around in shirtsleeves, No Jacket Required. > > > > All this has changed now. > > > > It's sad in a way. You could always point out from where we came and > > what a long way we've gone since then. > > > > wobo > > > > > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
