Joe, I have been reading with great interest all the postings about 3" pucks and spec coil over shocks for our class. The BOD's decision to turn down the 3" puck may have been a blessing in disguise. Earlier I was in favor of 3" pucks but as I have learned more about the need for dampening as the main method of reducing the shock to the chassis I am now in favor of ONE cost controlled, spec'ed, sealed coil over shock that has a supplier's "promise" not to discontinue it in the near future. The spec's should be compiled. A thorough search of the market must be done to ensure that all possible candidates have been uncovered and properly considered. A track test of the top three or four candidates should then be done to provide a comparative analysis. Once the choice is made and approved by SCCA we can then publisize the dickens out of this improvement in hopes of attracting more drivers. When can we start to poll the drivers? Jim ________________________________________________________________________ Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. ________________________________ FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500 The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003 _________________________________
_______________________________________________ F500 mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change options please visit: http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500 *** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***
