On Tuesday 29 July 2008 14:44:00 Joe Groff wrote: > In this scheme, how would you declare a > generic without defining any methods on it? Would something like this > work? > > DEFER: suffix ( seq obj -- seq )
Good question. You can still use the explicit 'GENERIC:' form. Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
